| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
alyson Neanderthal Man

Joined: 08 Nov 2005 Posts: 68 Location: Seattle, WA
|
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 11:23 pm Post subject: 2. Red Mars, by Kim Stanley Robinson |
|
|
Red Mars is about the colonization of Mars, from the very first scientific enclave through about thirty years of development, political intrigue, terraformation, philosophy, and social rest/unrest.
This book is probably right up some people's alley; obviously it's written well, and he probably researched the hell out of it too. You should read it if you like science fiction, and you like scientific plausibility, and you like straightforward historical accounts.
But it was a relief to finish it. A hard slog, for me. It was ok. _________________ Eschew obfuscation. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
galactic_dev Cro-Magnon Man

Joined: 04 Jan 2005 Posts: 345 Location: Boulder, CO
|
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 11:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| In that case, I recommend that you do not read the sequels, as they are not nearly as good (and I loved Red Mars and small snippets of the sequels). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Eisworth Homo Sapiens

Joined: 07 Jan 2005 Posts: 461 Location: Athens, OH
|
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 9:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I second that opinion...I really loved Red Mars, Green Mars was OK, and Blue Mars was a political science treatise.
I really liked his Three Californias (not really a trilogy) and "Years of Rice and Salt" is one of my favorites because I have a fondness for the history of science. _________________ Todd Eisworth
Associate Professor of Mathematics
Ohio University |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
malabar Homo Malabarus

Joined: 02 Jan 2006 Posts: 673 Location: Bristol, UK
|
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 12:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I maintain that Robinson is great at setting up seemingly insoluble dilemmas and then wimping out on their alleged solutions. Pity, really. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|